![]() David is very visual, but he’s also very, very much about the truth. Related Storiesīut that’s the kind of thing I would think David Fincher would like … Smarty Pants, he was like, “Have you ever actually cut a jugular? Do you know anything about anatomy? You could very easily hurt yourself! It’s got to be more precise.” So he didn’t buy it. He was like, “She’s too careful.” And of course, being Mr. Why did you change some of Amy’s methods, then? Such as the way she collects her own blood? ![]() Here’s the legal precedent for Nick getting out of jail. Stop thinking!”īut that did come in handy, because David does like to poke at you and make sure you know what you’re talking about, and I already had all the answers. ![]() I had done all those, I had done everything, and my editor was like, “Just give me the manuscript. If they test the ink from the diary pages that were supposed to be written seven years ago, was that fine? I got a long, complicated answer to that - unless it predates 1975, and unless it was a certain type … Basically, the answer was that it was okay as long as she used pens from the past 15 years or so. And by the end, I was asking my editor, “Can we just do an addendum, where we pretend it’s by Amy, and I’ll answer all the other questions you have about how I did it but couldn’t fit in here?” For instance, I had done research on ink, in pens, if you can date ink. The cop stuff is the least of my interests in writing these things, but I also knew to go to these far-out places that the story goes, you got to tap down everything, because if something unravels, that gives you a reason to start going, “I don’t buy it.” So I got very OCD. Good God, I tested everything, to be sure. Here she talks about what it was like to adapt her book, how she feels about the infamous “Cool Girl” speech becoming a cultural touchstone, and why David Fincher made her story less bloody.Īre you in any way like Amy? In terms of being careful about research, not in terms of being a sociopath! “The two have become one now,” she laughed. Even as intimately involved as she is with the both book and the film, Flynn has “trouble remembering” some of the details that belong to one and not the other. Gillian Flynn, who wrote the novel Gone Girl, is also the scribe behind Gone Girl the movie, which, in some ways, is both the same and a very different entity. If you haven’t and plan on seeing the movie unsullied, you might want to save this interview and read it afterwards. And you are still not mature enough to tell it like it is.We will be discussing Gone Girl plot and twists. ![]() "There will not be any solutions or plans presented in line with these figures here today, because these numbers are too uncomfortable. "How dare you pretend that this can be solved with just 'business as usual' and some technical solutions? With today's emissions levels, that remaining CO2 budget will be entirely gone within less than 8 1/2 years. Today that figure is already down to less than 350 gigatons. "To have a 67% chance of staying below a 1.5 degrees global temperature rise – the best odds given by the – the world had 420 gigatons of CO2 left to emit back on Jan. "So a 50% risk is simply not acceptable to us - we who have to live with the consequences. They also rely on my generation sucking hundreds of billions of tons of your CO2 out of the air with technologies that barely exist. But those numbers do not include tipping points, most feedback loops, additional warming hidden by toxic air pollution or the aspects of equity and climate justice. "The popular idea of cutting our emissions in half in 10 years only gives us a 50% chance of staying below 1.5 degrees, and the risk of setting off irreversible chain reactions beyond human control. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |